Another Very Occasional Lamentation about the National Political Media

Lots of craziness what with King-Burwell and HRC email story. But just going to note a couple of items from a short while back. Both ostensibly taking conservatives (Guiliani and O’Reilly) to task,  but actually stunning demonstrations of cluelessness.

1) Eric Wemple after someone explains how much Williams’ (who is in fact a prevaricating asshole) sins are worse:

Agreed. Williams appears to have laid down exaggerations and embellishments no matter the topic. O’Reilly, by contrast, appears to have an Argentina problem.

Now this was in fact before several other specific bits of BS  “came to light” (or got some coverage anyway).  But get a clue. The soft bigotry of low expectations strikes again.

2. Chris Cilliza (who apparently has a serious case of Clinton Derangement Syndrome) takes Rudy to “task” for his  black president doesn’t love America (… or me … or you) remarks. But in doing os he uncorks a howler of world historical proportions.

Making the “Obama isn’t really like you and me” argument in that setting plays into a corrosive racial narrative that Republicans have worked very hard to steer away from — and smartly so — during the Obama presidency.

So astuteness.

I voted for Obama and all I got was this lousy website

Or why Joan Walsh was fucking right and the neolib wonky fanboys  wrong on the admittedly crappy launch. First, I will simply note that the Rude Pundit himself calmly chimes in with a piece describing the Medicare Part D  rollout challenges. Soft bigotry of low expectations: Republicans judged on winning elections. Democrats judged on governing well, fixing Republican screw-ups, and winning elections.  And now I found I am all worn out  on this topic. If anyone even cares, they can go read my various comments on this Unfogged thread.

Or just contemplate this chart. Or read this paper from a Georgetown academic from June of this year comparing and contrasting the challenges of ACA with Medicare Part D.

Alex Koppelman is Fucking Insane

No more so than most in the political media, but the way various folks on my side of the political spectrum have been referencing his fatuous “Spinning Benghazi” piece from last Friday has been bugging the shit out of me.

For a long time, it seemed like the idea of a coverup was just a Republican obsession. But now there is something to it.

Right, bureaucratic talking point negotiations in the heat of events involving a clandestine facility in post-revolutionary Libya are “something.” And of course it now appears that ABC have found their new Chris Vlasto in John Karl who seriously misreported the nature and content of the freaking e-mails in a way calculated to add fuel to BENGHAZI!! But never mind that, even if the reporting had been correct Koppelman’s piece would have been insane in any sane world. Koppelman’s and just about everyone else’s political insanity (mine too) comes from trying to wrap our brains around a world where anything Darrell Issa says apparently has to be taken seriously. Or a world where the Republican House is preparing to take their 37th vote on repealing Obamacare. Or … I don’t know, I’m running out of steam on this, but let’s just say that the disproportionate attention to the “scandals” this week in the context of the last 20 years of American politics is literally insane. Tywin Lannister would be proud.

But no caveats on a giving Koppelman a big “Christ, what an asshole” for his last para:

This is an incredible thing for Carney to be saying. He’s playing semantic games, telling a roomful of journalists that the definition of editing we’ve all been using is wrong, that the only thing that matters is who’s actually working the keyboard. It’s not quite re-defining the word “is,” or the phrase “sexual relations,” but it’s not all that far off, either

Update: Ryan Lizza is also fucking insane. Talking to Darrell Issa, Like many journalists who haven’t followed every single twist and turn of the case, I found e-mails that had been leaked to ABC News the week before somewhat damning, and I said so. What the fuck is wrong with you fuckers?

Update 2: I am picking on Lizza and Koppelman because they are within shouting distance of being sane, unlike most in the political media. And then there are the calculating evil like Brian Williams.

“As a lot of American adults not so fondly remember, the last time the government was found looking into the phone calls of reporters and using the IRS for political purposes, it was the Nixon era, and while times have changed and circumstances are different that subject came up at the Obama White House today as the administration now scrambles on several fronts.”

Keep fucking that chicken, Brian.


Asshole Halloween

Asshole Halloween

A low moment for America; Bush prancing around like a First World Idi Amin ten years ago today.
(title from Frank Conniff)

Savage Boohoos Impersonate Elites of World’s Only Remaining Superpower

Too numerous to cite individually.

The NY Times makes a funny about torture

Black comedy gold from the NY Times. “U.S. Engaged in Torture After 9/11, Review Concludes.

Gee! D’ya think? Certainly reporting on the report in itself is legitimate and mad props to the folks put together the report itself, but this bit really is fucking hilarious:

News organizations have wrestled with whether to label the brutal methods unequivocally as torture in the face of some government officials’ claims that they were not.

For you kids at home, that’s how the pros do it.

Here’s a trip down memory lane with regard to the Times “wrestling” with how to characterize “brutal methods.” (Hint: Turns out it’s torture when someone else does it. When we do it, not so much.) Stick to Real Estate Porn and Ivy League Aspirational Masturbation you half-witted wankers masquerading as the newspaper of record.

Fatuousness thy name is Politico

Try to beat this from Dylan Byers on the press and Boston.

It’s been more than 24 hours since the explosions in Boston. But while new details emerge by the hour, the question on so many people’s minds remains unanswered: Who did it?

We’re standing on the verge of a very important national conversation about something, and we have no idea what it is.

True, but 24 hours seems a lot longer in the dark. The prospect of another 24 — or 48, or 72, or 96 — is hardly welcome.

Word fail. I can only hope Richard Jewell gets a chance to piss on Byers in the afterlife. In the meantime a damning report on torture and the media’s complicity in not calling it what it was is ignored. Despicable and will be rightly judged unremittingly harshly by history.